Petrie v Civello & Rossi – European Parliament missing tapes recovered – Italian Supreme Court of Cassation

Rome, 7 October 2011

I was in the Italian Supreme Court of Cassation this morning for an appeal in Petrie v Civello and Rossi. On 29 January 2003 a Court of First Instance in Bologna awarded  me damages of €19,000 for defamation. This judgment was overturned by the Bologna Appeal Court on 17 June 2008.

At the Italian Supreme Court of Cassation

This morning my lawyer argued 4 points, two of which concerned formalities. One of these points was that proper legal formalities concerning the state advocate’s mandate to take the case to the appeal court had not been followed. The Advocate General supported this view and if the court follows, then the Bologna Appeal Court judgment of 17 June 2008 would be struck down.

On the merits – it was argued that although I did not say at a hearing in the European Parliament that “Italy is country of the mafia” … my speech (in English) may have been incorrectly interpreted into Italian.

It was further argued that people must have the right to free expression and to criticise. While we recognise this – this right must not be abused and must be based on facts and not falsehoods.

At the hearing in the European Parliament in Brussels I did make reference to two concrete documented cases showing how “raccomandazione” – meaning favouring one candidate’s application over another on grounds other than meritocracy worked in the context of Italian universities.

I was represented by Professor Lorenzo Picotti who deposited 13 pages of legal reasoning and was allowed ample to illustrate his points to the five judges in the Supreme Court.

I would expect to receive a judgment in a few months.

For background to the the case read on ….

1)      Hearing of the Employment and Social Affairs Committee – European Parliament – 26.02.97

In Brussels, on 26 February 1997 I gave evidence to the Employment and Social Affairs Committee of the European Parliament. I was speaking in my capacity as chairman of ALLSI, (Association of Foreign Lecturers in Italy) on the longstanding dispute concerning discrimination against non-Italian foreign lecturers “lettori” working in Italian universities.

At the same hearing, the Italian state was represented by Bruno Civello, a functionary in the Italian Ministry of Education and by Adriano Rossi, a former vice-Chancellor of the Oriental University of Naples.

At the hearing I highlighted examples of how laws and practices in Italian university are used to prevent non-Italians from receiving equal treatment under EU single market rules, with regard to access to employment, mutual recognition of qualifications, salaries, maternity leave and pensions.

My speech was interrupted by Italian MEPs and chairman Stephen Hughes MEP  had to intervene twice to restore order and defend my right to be heard.

2)      Public meeting – Bologna 23.01.98

Subsequently, on 23 January 1998 I attended  a public meeting in Bologna at which Bruno Civello  was addressing  an audience of around 200 lecturers and trade unionists.

Giorgio Bruno CivelloAt that meeting Bruno Civello alleged that Italy had been defamed in the European Parliament as “a country run by the Mafia” and that the author of the defamation was sitting in the auditorium. I protested that Mr Civello’s remarks were false and defamatory and I invited him to withdraw them. He refused, whereupon Adriano Rossi stood up and supported Civello’s accusation, adding that he too was present at the Brussels meeting of 26 February 1997.

Prof. Adriano Rossi ex-Vice Chancellor of Naples Oriental UniversityI informed them, and the meeting, that a journalist working for The Guardian had recorded my entire speech to the European Parliament and that the journalist had given me a copy.

I told them if they withdrew the false and defamatory accusation we could get on with the meeting and I would take the matter no further.

They refused.

On 27 July 1998 I raised an action in Bologna against Mr Civello and Mr Rossi for defamation.

3)      The Guardian tape and the (missing)  European Parliament tapes

During the procedural phase of the case my lawyer wanted the court to hear “The Guardian tape” as evidence. The Italian state advocate, representing  Civello and Rossi  objected saying  that the authenticity of the “Guardian”  tape could not be guaranteed , the judge agreed and ruled that the tape was inadmissible.

On Thursday 2 December 1999 I visited the European Parliament and asked Mr  Roy Perry MEP  if he could supply me with an officially authenticated copy of my  speech from the tape recordings  held in archives of the European Parliament’s Employment and Social Affairs Committee.  Mr Perry’s assistant took me to the appropriate office.

I was handed a carton containing only 9 tapes – where there should have been  10.

No one could explain why the 10th tape was missing – the missing  tape was the one which I recorded me speaking directly in English.

Four cassettes were “originals” – in which each speaker is recorded directly in the language he is speaking and 5 were all in French, the “interpreters” copy.

I identified tape number 2 “TECH/OP.MC8 “Situation des enseignants étrangers dans les universities italiennes” as the interpreters (in French) tape of the hearing and was supplied with an authenticated copy.

However, when we came to transcribing the ( French) interpreters version of my speech we discovered that the tape had been damaged/wiped – obliterating parts of my speech at a crucial point.

Since I had been informed that backups are made of all tapes, I asked Mr Perry to procure a copy of my original speech in English from the Parliament’s backup archives.

On 10 December 1999, Mr Perry’s assistant phoned me saying that the Employment and Social Affairs Office did not have a backup either in English or French.

No one could explain why no backup could be found.

4)      The Brussels police and the recovery of the (missing) European Parliament tape.

On 4 May 2000 I lodged a complaint with the Brussels police alleging theft and damage to intellectual property. Since the tapes were not in their usual place, theft was the only plausible explanation. The fact that 2 tapes were missing and a third  tape had been damaged – having been wiped in the part which was of interest to me – suggests the whole matter was orchestrated in order to prevent me from proving defamation in the case I had raised in Bologna.

Stephen Hughes MEP took the matter up with the President of the European Parliament, Madam Nicole Fontaine.

I informed the President’s lawyer Hans Kroek that I would sue the European Parliament for the value of the Bologna law suit – in the event that I am unable to recover the missing tape.

On 21 November 2000 Mr Kroeck furnished Sir Neil MacCormick MEP with an authenticated copy of the tape which was then forwarded in a sealed container to the Bologna court and was accepted in evidence.

5)       Bologna Court awards damages  06.04.03 – overturned by the Court of Appeal 25.09.08.

On 6 April 2003 the Bologna tribunal decided that the acquisition of the tape removed all doubt on the factual situation and that I did not use the expressions falsely attributed to me by Mr Civello and confirmed by Mr Rossi.  I was awarded €19,000 + interest in damages as well as costs of €6,520.

Mr Civello and Rossi were ordered to publish an extract of the judgment in both Corriere Della Sera and La Republica.  They refused to comply with the Court’s order to publish the extract. I therefore paid for its publication and recovered the cost from them through the courts. See link

This entry was posted in Discrimination based on nationality in Italian universities, Europe, European Parliament, European Treaty, Free movement of workers in EU and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Petrie v Civello & Rossi – European Parliament missing tapes recovered – Italian Supreme Court of Cassation

  1. George Metcalf says:

    This is a crystal clear demonstration of why the courts are an unsatisfactory means of gaining redress of grievancxes in Italy. 13 years after first filing the complaint – a fairly straightforward one at that – and the process is still dragging on! Italian taxpayers fork out for the university’s legal fees, enabling them to drag the cases out over decades, in the hope that plaintiffs will either give up or die. When will European institutions realise that citizens’ rights need to be defended in a more robust, dependable and above all timely manner?

  2. Raphael Aceto says:

    The story of the missing tape brings to mind the kind of skullduggery performed by the villains in Grisham or Forsyth! On a more mundane level, the fact that this account concerns a tape dredges up (bad) memories of Watergate.

  3. Neil Walker says:

    Incredible to imagine the goings on behind the scenes!
    And to think that our ex Preside once asked me who is behind YOU!!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s